RBI’s recent report reveals a shift in credit distribution, with metropolitan bank branches’ share declining to 58.7% in March 2025, from 63.5% five years prior, due to faster credit growth in non-metro areas. Despite this, metropolitan branches still lead in deposit mobilization, growing at 11.7%.
The City’s Grip Loosens: Are Metro Banks Losing the Credit Race?
Okay, let’s talk money. Specifically, where India’s credit is flowing, and who’s getting a bigger slice of the pie. If you’ve been paying attention, you’ll have noticed a shift happening in the banking landscape, and the latest data confirms it: metropolitan bank branches are experiencing a dip in their share of the national credit pool.
Now, before you picture tumbleweeds rolling down the aisles of those gleaming city branches, let’s clarify. They’re not exactly going bankrupt. But the numbers tell a compelling story – a story of evolving financial access and potentially shifting economic priorities.
Five years ago, metro branches commanded a hefty 63.5% of the total credit distributed across India. Today? That figure has shrunk to 58.7%. That’s a noticeable 4.8% decrease. While seemingly small, that percentage represents a significant chunk of money being directed elsewhere. The real question is, where is it going?
The answer, unsurprisingly, lies in the burgeoning semi-urban and rural landscapes. These areas are steadily becoming economic powerhouses, and the demand for credit is mirroring that growth. Think about it: expanding agricultural businesses, new manufacturing hubs popping up in smaller towns, and a generally increasing entrepreneurial spirit across the country. All of these require capital.
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. In fact, it could be argued that this shift is a sign of a healthier, more distributed economy. Concentrated economic power in the major metros is a historical legacy, and a more even distribution can lead to greater overall prosperity and reduced regional disparities. The government has also consciously pushed for greater financial inclusion, encouraging banks to expand their reach beyond the usual urban strongholds. This nudge, combined with the inherent market demand, is clearly having an effect.
However, let’s not write off the metro banks just yet. While their overall share is decreasing, they still control the majority of the credit market. They’re the titans of the industry, and their influence remains substantial. What is interesting is how they are adapting to this evolving landscape.
Are they proactively shifting their focus, opening more branches in smaller towns and cities? Are they investing in technology to reach a wider audience, offering digital banking solutions that bypass the need for physical branches? Or are they doubling down on serving the high-net-worth individuals and established businesses that remain firmly rooted in the metros? The strategy they adopt will be crucial in determining their long-term success.
One could also speculate about the kind of credit being distributed. Are metro branches primarily focused on large corporate loans, while smaller loans for agriculture or micro-enterprises are being handled by banks with a stronger presence in rural areas? The types of lending activities undoubtedly influence the numbers.
Furthermore, the rise of non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) plays a role here. These entities often cater to specific sectors or demographics, and they have been aggressively expanding their reach, particularly in areas where traditional banks have been hesitant to venture. Their growing influence is further contributing to the redistribution of credit.
It’s also worth pondering the long-term implications of this trend. Will this shift continue? Will we see a more dramatic redistribution of credit in the coming years, potentially reshaping the banking landscape entirely? This depends on a multitude of factors, including government policies, technological advancements, and the overall economic trajectory of the country.
Ultimately, the slight dip in credit share for metropolitan bank branches doesn’t signify a crisis. It’s more of a subtle, yet significant, indicator of a changing financial landscape. It’s a signal that the engine of economic growth is firing on more cylinders, reaching further and wider than ever before. And while the city banks still hold considerable power, they’ll need to adapt and innovate to thrive in this new, more democratized financial environment. The game is changing, and the players are all adjusting their strategies. The coming years will be fascinating to watch as the credit race unfolds across the diverse terrain of India. It’s less about one losing, and more about the whole country winning through more equitable access to the capital needed to fuel growth.
📬 Stay informed — follow us for more insightful updates!
